Social mobilizations in response to the crisis of public policies: instruments of democratic resistance
Mobilizações sociais em resposta à crise das políticas públicas: instrumentos de resistência democrática
Movilizaciones sociales en respuesta a la crisis de las políticas públicas: instrumentos de resistencia democrática
Abstract (en)
This theoretical article analyzes the role of social mobilizations as instruments of democratic resistance against the contemporary crisis and dismantling of public policies. Faced with global processes of institutional erosion and autocratization, elected officials employ gradual tactics to weaken traditional channels of dialogue and collective representation. The budgetary asphyxiation and administrative disruption of social welfare networks do not constitute merely technical decisions; rather, they represent planned strategies for mass control and the neutralization of dissent. Adopting a qualitative bibliographic research methodology, this study examines the necessary transition from purely institutional resilience to active social-based resistance. The results of this reflection indicate that organized manifestations of citizenship constitute the last bulwark for protecting fundamental rights when the system of checks and balances becomes inoperative. In this regard, the occupation of public space reconstructs collective ties of solidarity essential for the survival of the constitutional regime.
Abstract (pt_BR)
O presente artigo de reflexão analisa o papel das mobilizações sociais como instrumentos de resistência democrática frente à crise e ao desmantelamento das políticas públicas contemporâneas. Diante de processos globais de erosão institucional e autocratização, governantes eleitos utilizam-se de táticas graduais para fragilizar os canais tradicionais de diálogo e representação coletiva. A asfixia orçamentária e a desestruturação administrativa das redes de amparo social não configuram decisões meramente técnicas, mas sim estratégias planejadas de controle de massas e neutralização de dissidências. Adotando uma metodologia de pesquisa bibliográfica qualitativa, o estudo examina a transição necessária da resiliência puramente institucional para uma resistência ativa de base social. Os resultados da reflexão apontam que as manifestações organizadas de cidadania constituem o último anteparo de proteção dos direitos fundamentais quando o sistema de freios e contrapesos se encontra inoperante. Nesse sentido, a ocupação do espaço público reconstrói laços de solidariedade coletiva fundamentais para a sobrevivência do regime constitucional.
Abstract (es)
El presente artículo de reflexión analiza el papel de las movilizaciones sociales como instrumentos de resistencia democrática frente a la crisis y al desmantelamiento de las políticas públicas contemporáneas. Ante procesos globales de erosión institucional y autocratización, los gobernantes electos utilizan tácticas graduales para debilitar los canales tradicionales de diálogo y representación colectiva. La asfixia financiera y la desestructuración administrativa de las redes de amparo social no configuran decisiones meramente técnicas, sino estrategias planificadas de control de las masas y neutralización de disidencias. Mediante la adopción de una metodología de investigación bibliográfica cualitativa, el estudio examina la transición necesaria desde la resiliencia puramente institucional hacia una resistencia activa de base social. Los resultados de la reflexión señalan que las manifestaciones organizadas de la ciudadanía constituyen el último baluarte de protección de los derechos fundamentales cuando el sistema de frenos y contrapesos se encuentra inoperante. En este sentido, la ocupación del espacio público reconstruye lazos de solidaridad colectiva fundamentales para la supervivencia del régimen constitucional.
References
Abels, C., Dewitte, L., Kurvers, R., & Spruyt, B. (2024). Dodging the autocratic bullet: Enlisting behavioral science to arrest democratic backsliding. Behavioral Public Policy, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2024.43 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2024.43
Adamska-Gallant, A. (2022). Backsliding of the rule of law in Poland: A systemic problem with the independence of courts. International Journal of Court Administration, 13(1), 47–60. https://iacajournal.org/articles/10.36745/ijca.474 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.474
Andion, C., & Magalhães, T. (2021). (Re)aproximando os pragmatismos da análise das políticas públicas: Experimentação e investigação pública em um cenário de crise democrática. Sociedade e Estado, 36(2), 513–543. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-6992-202136020007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-6992-202136020007
Araújo, M. A. D. de, & Macedo, M. N. (2022). O desmonte da educação superior no governo Bolsonaro. Anais do Encontro Brasileiro de Administração Pública, 1–15. https://sbap.org.br/ebap/index.php/home/article/view/358
Baron, H., Blair, R. A., Gottlieb, J., & Paler, L. (2024). An events-based approach to understanding democratic erosion. PS: Political Science & Politics, 57(2), 208–215. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096523001026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096523001026
Bonifati, L. (2023). Constitutional design and the seeds of degradation in divided societies: The case of Bosnia-Herzegovina. European Constitutional Law Review, 19(2), 223–248. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019623000123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019623000123
Borges, F. da S., & Romanell, S. B. (2016). Supremo espetáculo: Aproximações sobre as imagens públicas do STF. Mediações, 21(1), 199–235. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/7488/748879437010.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.5433/2176-6665.2016v21n1p199
Breen, J. (2023). Democratic erosion and the United States Supreme Court. Utah Law Review, 2023(3), 615–632. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4398320 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4398320
Brito, A. S. de, Sanctis, A., & Castilho, M. (2023). O caminho da autocracia: Estratégias atuais de erosão democrática. Tinta-da-China Brasil.
Bugarič, B. (2015). A crisis of constitutional democracy in Post-Communist Europe: ‘lands in-between’ democracy and authoritarianism. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 13(1), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mov010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mov010
Buzogány, A., & Spöri, T. (2024). Cities against democratic backsliding: Democratic resilience through urban resistance in the Visegrád 4 capitals. Contemporary Politics, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2024.2394345 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2024.2394345
Camilo Junior, V. G. (2025a). Democracias globais em colapso: Erosão democrática e tendências autocráticas no século XXI. Em Direito aplicado: Justiça social e diversidade. Insigne Acadêmica.
Camilo Junior, V. G. (2025b). De la erosión democrática a la autocratización: Patrones y tendencias en el siglo XXI. Revista de Derecho, 25(1), 182–207. https://doi.org/10.26441/RD-4086 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26441/RD-4086
Camilo Junior, V. G. (2025c). Panorama da erosão democrática no século XXI. Contribuciones a las Ciencias Sociales, 18(9), e20816. https://doi.org/10.55905/revconv.18n.9-169 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55905/revconv.18n.9-169
Carlos, E., Pereira, M. M., & Rodrigues, C. (2025). Desmonte de políticas públicas no governo Bolsonaro: Políticas para mulheres, de igualdade racial e para LGBTQIA+ em perspectiva comparada. Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política, e124044. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-044ec/124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-044ec/124
Del Tronco, J., & Monsiváis-Carrillo, A. (2020). La erosión de la democracia. Revista de Estudios Sociales, (74), 2–11. https://doi.org/10.7440/res74.2020.01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7440/res74.2020.01
Dilawar, K., & Khan, I. (2024). Unraveling democratic erosion: causes, patterns, and remedies (2010-2020). International Journal of Contemporary Issues in Social Sciences, 3(2), 2404-2411. https://ijciss.org/index.php/ijciss/article/view/969
Gerschewski, J. (2020). Erosion or decay? Conceptualizing causes and mechanisms of democratic regression. Democratization, 28(1), 43-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1826935 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1826935
Higashijima, M., Kadoya, H., & Yanai, Y. (2024). The dynamics of electoral manipulation and institutional trust in democracies: Election timing, blatant fraud, and the legitimacy of governance. Public Opinion Quarterly, 88(SI), 472-494. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfae022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfae022
Kneuer, M. (2021). Unravelling democratic erosion: Who drives the slow death of democracy, and how? Democratization, 28(8), 1442–1462. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.1925650 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.1925650
Kneuer, M. (2023). Trends on democratic erosion: The role of agency and sequencing. International Political Science Abstracts, 73(6), 837–847. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208345231218076 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00208345231218076
Kubinska, A., & Luining, M. (2024). In (our) courts we trust! Capturing the dynamics of trust and distrust in the constitutional judiciary in Poland under PiS hybrid rule. Erasmus Law Review, 17, 6. https://www.boomportaal.nl/tijdschrift/EEYHR/ELR-D-24-00018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5553/ELR.000272
Laebens, M. G., & Lührmann, A. (2021). What halts democratic erosion? The changing role of accountability. Democratization, 28(5), 908-928. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.1897109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.1897109
Lee, F. L. F., Yuen, S., & Tang, G. K. Y. (2024). Adaptation and resilience: How pro-democracy protesters respond to autocratisation in Hong Kong. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2024.2424173 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2024.2424173
Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). Como as democracias morrem. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar.
Magnago, C., & Martins, C. L. (2023). Crises contemporâneas: Retrocessos sociais, políticas de saúde e desafios democráticos. Saúde e Sociedade, 32, e230228pt. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902023230228pt DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-12902023230228en
McCoy, J., Rahman, T., & Somer, M. (2018). Polarization and the global crisis of democracy: Common patterns, dynamics, and pernicious consequences for democratic polities. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(1), 16–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218759576 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218759576
Mussei, H. G., & Quadros, D. d. (2022). Erosão democrática e legalismo autocrático: O caso dos conselhos gestores no governo Bolsonaro. REI: Revista Estudos Institucionais, 8(3), 582–606. https://doi.org/10.21783/rei.v8i3.680 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21783/rei.v8i3.680
Pellegrina, L. D., Garoupa, N., & Gili, M. (2025). Judicial transformation: The case of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal. European Journal of Political Research, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1475676525100340 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1475676525100340
Rau, E. G., & Stokes, S. (2025). Income inequality and the erosion of democracy in the twenty-first century. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(1), e2422543121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2422543121 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2422543121
Riedl, R. B., Blaustein, L., & Grewal, S. (2025). Democratic backsliding, resilience, and resistance. World Politics, 77(1), 151–177. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2025.a954440 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2025.a954440
Rovny, J. (2023). Antidote to backsliding: Ethnic politics and democratic resilience. American Political Science Review, 117(4), 1410–1428. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305542200140X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305542200140X
Roznai, Y. (2020). Who will save the redheads? Towards an anti-bully theory of judicial review and protection of democracy. William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 29(2), 327–348. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj/vol29/iss2/3
Sadurski, W. (2018). How democracy dies (in Poland): A case study of anti-constitutional populist backsliding. Sydney Law School Research Paper, (18/01), 1–32. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3103491 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3103491
Solska, M. (2020). Democratic erosion? One dominant party and ineffective opposition. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 58(1), 105–120. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcms.13104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13104
Somer, M., & McCoy, J. (2018). Déjà vu? Polarization and endangered democracies in the 21st century. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218760371 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218760371
Thibes, M. Z., Pereira, N. B., Segurado, R., & Chicarino, T. S. (2020). Movimentos sociais e coletivos no Brasil contemporâneo: Horizontalidade, redes sociais e novas formas de representação política. Simbiótica, 7(3), 49–73. https://doi.org/10.47456/simbitica.v7i3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47456/simbitica.v7i3.33695
Tormey, S. (2021). Stresses and strains: Will we ever agree on what’s going wrong with democracy? Representation, 58(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2021.2005674 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2021.2005674
Waisbich, L. T. (2025). Desmonte e resposta ao desmonte: Mobilização de comunidades de políticas e relações Estado-sociedade em tempos de retrocesso democrático no Brasil. Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política, (124), e124034. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-034lt/124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-034lt/124
Yabanci, B., Akkoyunlu, K., & Öktem, K. (2025). Limits of autocratisation: Actors and institutions of democratic resistance and opposition. Third World Quarterly, 46(2), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2025.2462248 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2025.2462248
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Valter Geronimo Camilo Junior

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Los contenidos de la revista se distribuyen bajo la licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-4.0), que permite a los usuarios copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente los contenidos, siempre y cuando se cite la autoría (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0).