La europeización de las políticas de prevención de la corrupción en España
Europeanization of Corruption Prevention Policies in Spain
Resumo (en)
Discussions on how to prevent corruption are now at the heart of the most influential international organizations and research centers. The best ideas in this field are spreading rapidly through all organizations. This fact has combined with the European response to the economic crisis triggered by COVID-19 to generate a new process of change in Spanish anti-corruption policies. The European Union has created the Next Generation Funds (NGEU) to help the member states hardest hit by the pandemic-related crisis not only to recover from it, but also to put in place the necessary reforms to strengthen their resilience to face similar crises in the future. Given that the management of these funds, according to European regulations, is strongly conditioned not only to ensure their effective and efficient use, but also to avoid any risk of corruption, fraud and conflict of interest, all organizations (public and private) that will have any responsibility in the use of this money are obliged to develop solid control schemes that minimize such risks. This fact represents a unique opportunity for the Europeanization and improvement of Spanish anti-corruption policies. This work analyzes, comparatively with previous anti-corruption reforms, the model of change that this reform represents. It also describes the general lines of hard and soft regulation approved on this matter in Spain, as well as the implementation that the ministries most affected by the management of NGEU are carrying out of the control systems promoted by the EU. This work evaluates its positive, but also the negative ones derived from a vertical, abrupt, and accelerated model of change.
Referências
Acemoglou, D. y Robinson, J. A. (2013), Why Nations Fail, London, Profile Books; LTD.
Aguilar, Susana (2003), “Efectos y mecanismos de la europeización: reflexiones en torno a la política medioambiental española”, en Revista de Estudios Políticos (Nueva Época), Nº 120, abril-junio, pp. 219-243.
Argandoña, Antonio (2017), “Private and Public Corruption: Facilitating Payments”, en The Changing Face of Corruption in the Asia Pacific: Current Perspectives and Future Challenges, C. Rowley y Marie de la Rama (eds.), Cambridge, Elsevier, pp. 71-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-101109-6.00005-8
Baumgartner, Frank y Jones, Bryan (1991), “Agenda Dynamics and Policy Sub-Systems”, en Journal of Politics, Vol. 53 N° 4, pp. 1044-1074. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2131866
Biderbost, Pablo; Boscán, Guillermo; y Rochin, Nalia (2020), “Gestión de riesgos de corrupción en el sector público ante la administración de desastres”, en Revista del CLAD Reforma y Democracia, N° 76, marzo, pp. 215-236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.69733/clad.ryd.n76.a204
Checkel, Jeffrey (2007), “Institutional Institutions as Community Builders”, en International Institutions and Socialization in Europe, Jeffrey Checkel (ed.), Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618444
CLAD (2018), “Carta Iberoamericana de Ética e Integridad en la Función Pública”, Caracas, CLAD. Aprobada por la XVIII Conferencia Iberoamericana de Ministras y Ministros de Administración Pública y Reforma del Estado, en Antigua, Guatemala, 26 y 27 de julio.
Davies, Tim y Silvana Fumega (2014), “Mixed Incentives: Adopting ICT Innovations for Transparency, Accountability, and Anti-Corruption”, en Anti-Corruption Resource Center, U4 Issue, N° 4, June.
DiMaggio, Paul J. y Powell, Walter W. (1983), “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields”, en American Sociological Review, Vol. 48 Nº 2, April, pp. 147-160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
España. Ministerio de Hacienda y Función Pública (2020), IV Plan de Gobierno Abierto, España (2020-24), Madrid, Secretaría General Técnica. Centro de Publicaciones.
España. Ministerio de Industria, Comercio y Turismo (2022), “Orientaciones para el refuerzo de los mecanismos para la prevención, detección y corrección del fraude, la corrupción y los conflictos de intereses, referidos en el artículo 6 de la Orden HFP 1030/2021, de 29 de septiembre, por la que se configura el sistema de gestión del Plan de Recuperación, Transformación y Resiliencia”, Madrid, Ministerio de Hacienda y Función Pública.
España. Ministerio de Industria, Comercio y Turismo (2022a), Plan de medidas antifraude, Madrid, Ministerio de Industria, Comercio y Turismo, 2 de junio, https://www.mincotur.gob.es/es-es/recuperacion-transformacion-resiliencia/Documents/plan-medidas-antifraude-mincotur.pdf.
España. Ministerio de Industria, Comercio y Turismo (2022b), Declaración Institucional de Lucha contra el Fraude, Madrid, Ministerio de Industria, Comercio y Turismo, 2 de junio, https://www.mincotur.gob.es/es-es/recuperacion-transformacion-resiliencia/Documents/declaracion-institucional-lucha-contra-fraude.pdf.
España. Ministerio de Universidades (2022), Plan de medidas antifraude para la gestión de los fondos Next Generation UE, Madrid, Ministerio de Universidades.
España. Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica y el Reto Demográfico (2022), Plan de medidas antifraude, del Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica y el Reto Demográfico, Madrid, Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica y el Reto Demográfico, 2 de junio, https://www.miteco.gob.es/es/ministerio/recuperacion-transformacion-resiliencia/prevencion-fraude/planantifraudecompletov1_tcm30-537956.pdf.
Evans, Peter y Rauch, James E. (1999), “Bureaucracy and Growth: a Cross-National Analysis of the Effects of ‘Weberian’ State Structures on Economic Growth”, en American Sociological Review, Vol. 64 N° 5, pp. 748-765. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000312249906400508
Fukuyama, Francis (2015), Political Order and Political Decay: from the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy, New York, MacMillan.
Gobierno de España (2021), “Plan de recuperación, transformación y resiliencia: España puede”, Madrid, Gobierno de España.
Gomá, Ricard y Subirats, Joan (eds.) (1998), Políticas públicas en España. Contenidos, redes de actores y niveles de gobierno, Ariel, Barcelona.
Hidalgo-Pérez, Manuel; Manfredi Sánchez; Juan Luis; y Benítez Palma, Enrique (2022), Capacidad administrativa y absorción de los fondos Next-Generation, en Gestión y Análisis de Políticas Públicas (Nueva Época), Nº 29, julio, pp. 72-87, https://doi.org/10.24965/gapp.11078. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24965/gapp.11078
Hooghe, Liesbet y Marks, Gary (2001), Multi-Level Governance and European Integration, Oxford, Rowman and Littlefields Publishers.
IMF (1997), The Role of the IMF in Governance Issues: Guidance Note, Washington, International Monetary Fund.
Jones, Bryan D. y Baumgartner, Frank R. (2005), The Politics of Attention. How Government Prioritizes Problems, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
Jordan, Andrew (2001), “The Europeanisation of Environmental Policy: European Union and Member State Perspectives”, paper presented at the Cambridge Workshop on the “Europeanisation of Environmental Policy”, June 29-July 1.
Kaufmann, Daniel; Kraay, Aart; y Zoido-Lobaton, Pablo (1999), “Governance Matters”, Washington, World Bank (Policy Research Working Paper; N° 2196).
Kaufmann, Daniel; Kraay, Aart; y Mastruzzi, Massimo (2004), “Governance Matters III: Governance Indicators for 1996, 1998, 2000, and 2002”, en World Bank Economic Review, Vol. 18 N° 2, pp. 253-287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhh041
Kingdon, John W. (1995), Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies, New York, Addison-Wesley Longman. 2. ed.
Knack, Stephen y Keefer, Philip (1995), “Institutions and Economic Performance: Cross-Country Tests Using Alternative Institutional Measures”, en Economic and Politics, Vol. 7 N° 3, pp. 207-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0343.1995.tb00111.x
Maesschalck, Jeroen y Bertok, Janos (2009), Towards a Sound Integrity Framework: Instru¬ments, Processes, Structures and Conditions for Implementation, Paris, OECD. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2652177
March, James G. y Olsen, Johan P. (1989), Rediscovering Institutions: the Organizational Basis of Politics, New York, The Free Press.
Marquette, H. y Peiffer, C. (2018), “Grappling with the ‘Real Politics’ of Systemic Corruption: Theoretical Debates versus ‘Real-World’ Functions”, en Governance, Vol. 31 N° 3, pp. 499-514, https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12311
Mauro, Paulo (1995), “Corruption and Growth”, en Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 110 N° 3, pp. 681-712. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2946696
North, Douglass (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678
OCDE (2020), Manual de la OCDE sobre Integridad Pública, París, OCDE.
ONU (2004), Convención de las Naciones Unidas contra la Corrupción, Viena, Oficina de las Naciones Unidas contra la Droga y el Delito.
Ostrom, Elinor (1990), Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763
Radaelli, Claudio M. (2003), “The Europeanization of Public Policy”, en The Politics of Europeanization, Kevin Featherstone y Claudio M. Radaelli (eds.), Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 27-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199252092.003.0002
Radaelli, Claudio M. y Pasquier, Romain (2006), “Conceptual Issues”, en Europeanization: New Research Agendas, Paolo Graziano y Maarten Vink (eds.), Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.
Rodrik, Dani; Subramanian, Arvin; y Trebbi, Francesco (2004), “Institutions Rule: the Primacy of Institutions over Geography and Integration in Economic Development”, en Journal of Economic Growth, Vol. 9 N° 2, pp. 131-165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOEG.0000031425.72248.85
Rose-Ackerman, Susan (2008), “Corruption”, en Readings in Public Choice and Constitutional Political Economy, Charles K. Rowley y Friedrich G. Schneider (eds.), Boston, Springer, pp. 551-566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-75870-1_30
Rothstein, Bo (2011), The Quality of Government. Corruption, Social Trust, and Inequality in International Perspective, Chicago, University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226729589.001.0001
Sabatier, Paul (1988), “An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy Learning Therein”, en Policy Sciences, N° 21, pp. 128-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136406
Sabatier, Paul y Jenkins-Smith, Hank (1999), “The Advocacy Coalition Framework: an Assessment”, en Theories of the Policy Process, P. Sabatier (ed.), Boulder, Westview Press, pp. 117-168.
Shipan, Charles y Volden, Craig (2008), “The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion”, en American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 52 N° 4, pp. 840-857. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00346.x
Streeck, Wolfgang y Thelen, Kathleen (2005), “Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies”, en Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, W. Streeck y K. Thelen (eds.), Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 1-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199280452.003.0001
Torcal, Mariano (2016), “Desafección política en España en una perspectiva comparada”, en Desafección política y regeneración democrática en la España actual, Francisco J. Llera (ed.), Madrid, Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales.
Transparency International (2023), Corruption Perception Index 2022, Berlin, Transparency International, https://www.transparency.org/country/DEU.
Tsebelis, George (2000), “Veto Players and Institutional Analysis”, en Governance, Vol. 13 Nº 4, October, pp. 441-474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0952-1895.00141
Villoria, Manuel y Jiménez, Fernando (2021), “Cómo gestionar los fondos de recuperación pospandemia de forma efectiva y honesta”, documento presentado en el XXVI Congreso Internacional del CLAD sobre la Reforma del Estado y de la Administración Pública, Bogotá, Colombia, 23 al 26 de noviembre.
Villoria, Manuel e Izquierdo, Agustín (2020), Ética pública y buen gobierno. Valores e instituciones para tiempos de incertidumbre, Madrid, Tecnos.
Wiener, Anthe (2009), “Enacting Meaning-in-Use: Qualitative Research on Norms and International Relations”, en Review of International Studies, Vol. 35 N° 1, pp. 175-193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210509008377
Williamson, Oliver (2000), “The ‘New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead’”, en Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 38 N° 3, pp. 595-613. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.38.3.595
World Bank (1996), The World Bank Annual Report 1996, Washington, World Bank, http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/672971468171577171/Banco-Mundial-informe-anual-1996.
Como Citar
Licença
Direitos autorais (c) 2023 Manuel Villoria Mendieta , Fernando Jiménez Sánchez
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
O conteúdo da revista é distribuído sob a licença Creative Commons Atribuição Não Comercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-4.0), que permite aos usuários copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir e exibir publicamente o conteúdo, desde que a autoria seja citada (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0).