Desafíos de gobernanza de inteligencia artificial en América Latina. Infraestructura, descolonización y nueva dependencia

Artificial Intelligence Governance Challenges in Latin America. Infrastructure, Decolonization and New Dependency

DOI: https://doi.org/10.69733/clad.ryd.n87.a3
Publicado
2024-08-22
Fernando Filgueira https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9570-8113

Resumen (es)

En muchas situaciones, los desafíos de gobernanza en América Latina son más específicos y dependen de crear una perspectiva sobre realidades sociales y políticas muy desiguales, heterogéneas en cuanto a las capacidades estatales, las diferencias en los mercados y las perspectivas sobre los emprendimientos sociotécnicos. La aplicación de la inteligencia artificial en la región ha implicado diferentes desafíos de gobernanza, incluyendo la sostenibilidad, el desarrollo económico, la salud y la educación, entre otros. Su avance la convierte en una herramienta esencial para enfrentar estos retos en los países en desarrollo. Los países latinoamericanos avanzan en la construcción de políticas estratégicas para dominar la inteligencia artificial con el fin de responder a diferentes problemáticas de desarrollo. Sin embargo, la forma en que se construyen estas políticas estratégicas tiene lugar dentro de su marco específico. Por un lado, los países latinoamericanos enfrentan el riesgo de dependencia tecnológica, incluidos los problemas de acceso a datos, infraestructura crítica para el desarrollo de la IA y capacidades técnicas y operativas. Por otro lado, expresan en sus políticas estratégicas elementos de ruptura de una lógica colonial que pueden reforzarse con sistemas sociotécnicos basados en inteligencia artificial. Este artículo trabajará con este marco dual que informa la construcción y aplicación de la inteligencia artificial en América Latina.

Palabras clave (ES): Inteligencia Artificial, Colonialismo, Dependencia, Infraestructura, Políticas Públicas

Resumen (en)

In many situations, governance challenges in Latin America are more specific and depend on creating a perspective on very unequal social and political realities, heterogeneous in terms of state capacities, differences in markets, and perspectives on socio-technical ventures. The application of artificial intelligence in the region has involved different governance challenges, including sustainability, economic development, health and education, among others. Its progress makes it an essential tool to face these challenges in developing countries. Latin American countries are advancing in the construction of strategic policies to master artificial intelligence in order to respond to different development issues. However, the way in which these strategic policies are built takes place within their framework. On the one hand, Latin American countries face the risk of technological dependence, including problems of access to data, critical infrastructure for AI development, and technical and operational capabilities. On the other hand, they express in their strategic policies elements of rupture of a colonial logic that can be reinforced with socio-technical systems based on artificial intelligence. This article will work with this dual framework that informs the construction and application of artificial intelligence in Latin America.

Palabras clave (EN): Artificial Intelligence, Colonialism, Dependency, Infrastructure, Public Policy

Fernando Filgueira, Universidade Federal de Goiás

Profesor asociado de la Facultad de Ciencias Sociales de la Universidad Federal de Goiás (UFG). Profesor del Programa de Doctorado en Políticas Públicas de la Escuela Nacional de Administración Pública (ENAP). Profesor afi liado al Ostrom Workshop on Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Indiana University. Investigador del Consejo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico (CNPq). Investigador del Instituto Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología-Calidad Gubernamental. Filgueiras tiene un doctorado en Ciencias Políticas del Instituto Universitario de Pesquisas do Río de Janeiro (IUPERJ). Universidad Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brasil. Escuela Nacional de Administración Pública, Brasilia, DF, Brasil.

Referencias

Acemoglu, D. (2021), “Harms of AI”, en J.B. Bullock; Chen, Y.C.; Himmelreich, J.; Hudson, V.; Korinek, A.; Young, M.M.; Zhang, B. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of AI governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Acemoglu, D.; Restrepo, P. (2020), “The wrong kind of AI? Artificial intelligence and the future of labour demand”, en Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Vol. 13 N°1, pp. 25-35, https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsz022

Amoore, L. (2022), “Machine learning political orders”, en Review of International Studies, N° 49 Vol.1, pp. 20-36, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210522000031

Arthur, W.B. (1989), “Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events”, en Economic Journal, Vol 99 N° 39), pp. 116–131, https://doi.org/10.2307/2234208

Avritzer, L. (2002), Democracy and public space in Latin America. Princeton, Princeton University Press.

Banos, A.M. (2023), “Data colonialism is not a metaphor: Remembering colonialism and why it matters in the digital ecosystem”, en The Tierra Comum Network (ed.), en Resisting data colonialism: A practical intervention, Amsterdam, Institute of Network Cultures.

Benjamin, R. (2019), Race after technology, New York,Polity Press.

Bertola, L. y Ocampo, J.A. (2012), The economic development of Latin America since independence, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Calo, R. (2017), “Artificial intelligence policy: A primer and roadmap”, en UCD Law Review, Vol. 51 N°2, pp. 399-435. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/davlr51&div=18&id=&page=

Cardoso, FH; Faletto, E. (1969), Dependency and development in Latin America, Mexico City, Siglo XXI.

Coeckelbergh, M. (2022), “Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence”, en AI & Ethics, early view, https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00239-4

Coles-Kemp, L.; Ashenden, D.; Morris, A.; Yuille, J. (2022), “Digital welfare: Designing for more nuanced forms of access”, en Policy Design and Practice, Vol. 3 N°2, pp. 177-188, https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1760414

Couldry, N.; Mejias, U. (2018), “Data colonialism: Rethinking big data’s relations to the contemporary subjects”, en Television & New Media, Vol. 20 N°4, pp. 336-349, https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418796632

Crawford, K. (2021), Atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence, New Haven, Yale University Press.

Diamond, L., Linz, J., & Lipset, SM (1995), “Introduction: What makes for democracy?”, en L. Diamond, J. Linz, and SM Lipset (Eds.), Politics in developing countries, Boulder, CO; Lynne Rienner.

Evangelista, R.; Bruno, F. (2019), “Whatsapp and political instability in Brazil: targeted messages and political radicalization”, en Internet Policy Review, Vol. 8 N°4, pp. 1-23, https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1434

ECLAC (2022), “A digital path for sustainable development in Latin America and the Caribbean”, Santiago, Eclac, https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/48461/4/S2200897_en.pdf

ECLAC (2021), “Digital public goods: Driving the development of digital public infrastructure in the Caribbean”, Santiago, Eclac – Focus, https://www.cepal.org/en/publications/48141-digital-public-goods-driving-development-digital-public-infrastructure-caribbean

Eubanks, V. (2018), Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor, New York, St Martin’s Press.

Feldstein, S. (2019), “The road to digital unfreedom. How artificial intelligence is reshaping repression”, en Journal of Democracy, Vol. 30 N°1, pp. 40–52, https://www.doi.org/10.1353/jod.2019.0003

Filgueiras, F.; Junquilho, T.A. (2023), “The Brazilian (non)perspective on national strategy on artificial intelligence”, en Discover Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 3 N° 7, pp. 1-15, https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-023-00052-w

Filgueiras, F. (2023), “Designing artificial intelligence policy: Comparing design spaces in Latin America”, en Latin American Policy, Vol. 14 N°1, pp. 5-21, https://doi.org/10.1111/lamp.12282

Floridi, L., Cowls, J., King, T.C., Taddeo, M. (2021), “How to design AI for social good: Seven essential factors”, en Floridi, L. (eds) Ethics, Governance, and Policies in Artificial Intelligence, Cham; Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81907-1_9

Floridi, L. (2020), “The fight for digital sovereignty: What it is, and why it matters, especially for EU”, en Philosophy & Technology, Vol. 33, pp. 369-378, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00423-6

Frischmann, B. (2012), Infrastructure. The social value of shared resources, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Furtado, C. (2010), Economic development of Latin America, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Gasser, U.; Almeida, VA (2017), “A layered model of AI governance”, en IEEE Internet Computing, Vol. 21 N°6, pp. 58-62, https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2017.4180835

Geist, S. (2017), “Big data for policymaking: Fad or fast track?”, en Policy Sciences, Vol. 50 N°3, pp. 367-382, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-017-9293-1

Hoffman, K.; Centeno, M.A. (2003), “The lopsided continent: Inequality in Latin America”, en Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 29, pp. 363-390, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100141

Howlett, M.P. (2009), “Policy capacity analytical and evidence-based policy-making: Lessons from Canada”, en Canadian Public Administration, Vol. 52 N°2, pp. 153-175, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.2009.00070_1.x

Hirschman, A. (1958), The strategy of economic development, New Haven, Yale University Press.

Issar, S.; Aneesh, A. (2022), “What is algorithmic governance?”, en Sociology Compass, Vol. 16 N°1, e12955, https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12955

Kitchin, R. (2022), The data revolution: A critical approach to big data, open data, and data infrastructures, Cambridge, Polity Books.

Knuth, D.E. (1968), The art of computer programming, Berkeley, Addison-Wesley.

Koga, N.; Palotti, P.L.M.; Bridges, P.A.M.M.; Couto, B.G.; Soares, M.L.V. (2023), “Analytical capacity is a critical condition for responding to Covid-19 in Brazil”, en Policy & Society, Vol. 42 N°1, pp. 117-130, https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puac028

König, P.D. (2019), “Dissecting the algorithmic Leviathan: On the socio-political anatomy of algorithmic governance”, en Philosophy & Technology, Vol. 33 N°4, pp. 467–485, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-019-00363-w

Li, Y.; Taeihagh, A.; De Jong, M. (2018), “The governance of risks in ride-sharing: A revelatory case from Singapore”, en Energies, Vol. 11 N°5, pp. 1277, https://doi.org/10.3390/en11051277

Markram, H. (2006), “The Blue Brain Project”, en Nature Reviews Neuroscience, Vol. 7,N° 2, pp. 153–160.

Meijer, A.; Wessels, M. (2019), “Predictive policing: Review of benefits and drawbacks. International Journal of Public Administration”, Vol. 42 N°12, pp. 1031–1039, https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1575664

Meijer, A.; Lorenz, L.; Wessels, M. (2021), “Algorithmization of bureaucratic organizations: Using a practical lens to study how context shapes predictive policing systems”, en Public Administration, Vol. 81 N°5, pp. 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13391

Mendonça, RF; Filgueiras, F.; Almeida, VA (2023), Algorithmic institutionalism. The changing rules of social + political life, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Minsky, M. (1985), The society of mind, New York, Simon and Schuster.

Noble, S. U. (2018), Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism, New York, New York University Press.

O'Neil, C. (2016), Weapons of math destruction. How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy, New York, NY, Crown.

Ostrom, E. (2005), Understanding institutional diversity, Princeton, Princeton University Press.

Pasquale, F. (2015), The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

Porciello, J.; Ivanina, M.; Islam, M.; Einarson, E.; Hirsch, H. (2020), “Accelerating evidence-informed decision-making for the Sustainable Development Goals using machine learning”, en Nature Machine Intelligence, N° 2, pp. 559-565, https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-020-00235-5

Prebisch, R. (2012), El desarollo económico de América Latina y algunos de sus principais problemas, Santiago, CEPAL, https://www.cepal.org/es/publicaciones/40010-desarrollo-economico-la-america-latina-algunos-sus-principales-problemas

Quijano, A. (2008), “Coloniality of power, eurocentrism, and social classification”, en M. Moraña; E. Dussel; C.A. Jáuregui (eds.), Coloniality at large: Latin America and the postcolonial debate, Durham, Duke University Press.

Reich, R.; Sahami, M.; Weinstein, J.M. (2021), System error: Where big tech went wrong and how we can reboot, New York, Harper.

Russell, S. (2019), Human compatible. Artificial intelligence and the problem of control, New York, Viking.

Russell, S.; Norvig, P. (2010), Artificial intelligence: A modern approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall.

Salas, J.; Patterson, G.; Vidal, F.B. (2022), A systematic mapping of artificial intelligence solutions for sustainable challenges in Latin America and Caribbean, IEEE Latin America Transactions, Vol.20 N°11, pp. 2312-2329.

Salas-Pilco, S.Z.; Yang, Y. (2022), “Artificial intelligence applications in Latin American higher education: a systematic review”, en International Journal of Education Technology in Higher Education, Vol. 19 N°21, pp. 1-20, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00326-w

Samuel, AL (1959), “Some studies in machine learning use the game of checkers”, en IBM Journal of Research and Development, Vol. 3, pp. 206–226.

Samuel, AL (1962), “Artificial intelligence: A frontier of automation”, en The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 340 N° 1, pp. 10-20, https://doi.org/10.1177/000271626234000103

Shannon, EC; Weaver, W. (1964), The mathematical theory of communication, Urbana,The University of Illinois Press.

Simon, H.A. (1996), The science of artificial, Cambridge, MIT Press.

Simon, HA (1995), “Artificial intelligence: An empirical science”, en Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 77 N°1, pp. 95-127, https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(95)00039-H

Suárez, D.; Yoguel, G. (2020), “Latin American development and the role of technology: an introduction”, en Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 29 N°7, pp. 661-669, https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2020.1715058

Taeihagh, A.; Ramesh, M.; Howlett, MP (2021), “Assessing the regulatory challenges of emerging disruptive technologies”, en Regulation & Governance, Vol. 15, pp. 1009-1019, https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12392

Tan, SY; Taeihagh, A. (2021), “Governing the adoption of robotics and autonomous systems in long-term care in Singapore”, en Policy and Society, Vol. 40 N°2, pp. 211-231, https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1782627

Treré, E.; Milan, S. (2021), “Latin American perspectives on datafication and artificial intelligence”, en Palabra Clave, Vol. 24 N°3, e2431, https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2021.24.3.1

Turing, A. (1950), “Computing machinery and intelligence”, en Mind—A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy, Vol. 59 N°236, pp. 433–460.

Valle-Cruz, D.; Created, JI; Sandoval- Almazán, R.; Ruvalcaba -Gomez, EA. (2020). “Assessing the public policy-cycle framework in the age of artificial intelligence: From agenda-setting to policy evaluation”, en Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 37 N°4, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101509

Weizenbaum, J. (1976), Computer power and human reason. From judgment to calculation, San Francisco, WH Freeman.

Winston, PH (1992), Artificial intelligence, New York, Addison-Wesley.

Wu, X.; Ramesh, M.; Howlett, M. (2015), “Policy capacity: A conceptual framework for understanding policy competences and capabilities”, en Policy and Society, 34 (3-4), pp. 165-171, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.09.001

Yeung, K. (2018). “Algorithmic regulation: A critical interrogation”, en Regulation & Governance, Vol. 12, pp. 505–523, https://doi.org/10.111/rego.12158

Zysman J. (1994). “How institutions create historically rooted trajectories of growth”, en Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 3 N°1, pp. 243–283, https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/3.1.243

Dimensions

PlumX

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Visitas

172

Cómo citar

Filgueira, F. (2024). Desafíos de gobernanza de inteligencia artificial en América Latina. Infraestructura, descolonización y nueva dependencia. Revista Del CLAD Reforma Y Democracia, 87. https://doi.org/10.69733/clad.ryd.n87.a3

Artículos similares

También puede Iniciar una búsqueda de similitud avanzada para este artículo.