Inteligência artificial para analisar o fenômeno GovTech: barreiras, facilitadores e tendências
Artificial intelligence to analyze the GovTech phenomenon: Barriers, facilitators and trends
Inteligencia artificial para analizar el fenómeno GovTech: barreras, facilitadores y tendencias
Resumen (es)
El fenómeno GovTech implica la colaboración entre gobiernos, empresas y otros actores utilizando tecnologías digitales para resolver problemas públicos complejos, con el objetivo de mejorar la eficacia, eficiencia, transparencia y accesibilidad de los servicios públicos, además de fomentar la participación ciudadana y generar valor público. No obstante, GovTech carece de definiciones académicas consolidadas y se considera una brecha de investigación. Este artículo exploró la literatura gris, como informes y publicaciones digitales, a través de un análisis documental apoyado por herramientas de Inteligencia Artificial (IA) — SciSpace, ChatGPT y Gemini — para responder: ¿cuáles son las barreras, los facilitadores y las tendencias relacionados con GovTech identificados con el apoyo de la IA? La validación de los datos se realizó mediante una triangulación entre cuatro investigadores, lo que incrementó la fiabilidad de los resultados. Se identificaron cuatro dimensiones principales: definiciones de GovTech, tendencias, facilitadores, barreras y desafíos. La investigación desarrolló un marco que consolida la información y destaca dimensiones clave del fenómeno, demostrando posibles interrelaciones. Los resultados ofrecen una comprensión ampliada y pueden aplicarse en diversos contextos, además de presentar una nueva agenda de investigación. Las tendencias apuntan hacia una creciente digitalización de los servicios públicos, el uso de datos en la toma de decisiones y la integración de tecnologías emergentes y sostenibles.
Resumen (pt_BR)
O fenômeno GovTech envolve a colaboração entre governos, empresas e outros atores por meio de tecnologias digitais para solucionar problemas públicos complexos, com o objetivo de melhorar a eficácia, a eficiência, a transparência e a acessibilidade dos serviços públicos, além de promover participação cidadã e gerar valor público. Apesar disso, GovTech carece de definições acadêmicas consolidadas e é considerado uma lacuna de pesquisa. Este artigo explorou a literatura cinzenta, como relatórios e publicações digitais, por meio de análise documental com apoio de ferramentas de Inteligência Artificial (IA) — SciSpace, ChatGPT e Gemini — para responder: quais são as barreiras, os facilitadores e as tendências relacionados a GovTech, identificados com apoio da IA? A validação dos dados ocorreu por triangulação entre quatro pesquisadores, aumentando a confiabilidade dos resultados. Foram identificadas quatro dimensões principais: definições de GovTech, tendências, facilitadores, barreiras e desafios. A pesquisa elaborou um framework que consolida as informações e evidencia as dimensões-chave do fenômeno, demonstrando possíveis inter-relações. Os resultados oferecem uma visão ampliada e podem ser aplicados em diversos contextos, além de apresentar nova agenda de pesquisa. As tendências apontam para a crescente digitalização dos serviços públicos, para o uso de dados na tomada de decisões e para a integração de tecnologias emergentes e sustentáveis.
Resumen (en)
The GovTech phenomenon involves collaboration between governments, companies, and other actors using digital technologies to solve complex public problems, aiming to improve the effectiveness, efficiency, transparency, and accessibility of public services, while fostering citizen participation and generating public value. However, GovTech lacks consolidated academic definitions and is considered a research gap. This article explored gray literature, such as reports and digital publications, through documentary analysis supported by Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools — SciSpace, ChatGPT, and Gemini — to answer: what are the barriers, facilitators, and trends related to GovTech identified with AI support? Data validation was conducted through triangulation among four researchers, increasing the reliability of the results. We identified four main dimensions: GovTech definitions, trends, facilitators, barriers, and challenges. The research developed a framework that consolidates information and highlights key dimensions of the phenomenon, demonstrating possible interrelations. The results provide an expanded understanding and can be applied in various contexts while presenting a new research agenda. Trends indicate increasing digitalization of public services, data-driven decision-making, and the integration of emerging and sustainable technologies.
Referencias
Accenture, & Public. (2018). GovTech: Europe’s next opportunity. Accenture & PUBLIC.
Almaiah, M. A., Al-Khasawneh, A., & Althunibat, A. (2020). Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the E-learning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 5261-5280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10219-y
Autio, E., & Thomas, L. D. W. (2014). Innovation Ecosystems: Implications for Innovation Management. Oxford University Press.
Bharosa, N. (2022). The rise of GovTech: Trojan horse or blessing in disguise? A research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 39(3), 101692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101692
Bogers, M., Sims, J., & West, J. (2019). What Is an Ecosystem? Incorporating 25 Years of Ecosystem Research. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2019(1), 11080. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2019.11080abstract
Christou, P. (2023). Ηow to Use Artificial Intelligence (AI) as a Resource, Methodological and Analysis Tool in Qualitative Research? The Qualitative Report, 28(7). https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6406
Codagnone, J. (2024). GOVTECH: Europe’s next opportunity. https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/collection/govtechconnect/news/govtech-europes-next-opportunity
Criado, J. I., Alcaide-Muñoz, L., & Liarte, I. (2023). Two decades of public sector innovation: Building an analytical framework from a systematic literature review of types, strategies, conditions, and results. Public Management Review, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2254310
Criado, J. I., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2019). Creating public value through smart technologies and strategies: From digital services to artificial intelligence and beyond. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 32(5), 438-450. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-07-2019-0178
Danish Agency for Digital Government. (2024, junho 28). NemKonto. https://en.digst.dk/systems/nemkonto/
Davydova, M. L. (2022). GovTech and Smart Regulation in Election Law. Revista Universidad y Sociedad, 14(1), 205-211.
Dominguez, G. D. F., & Duó, J. R. (2024). Mapa GovTech: Brasil 2024. BrazilLAB.
e-Estonia. ([s.d.]). Cyber security. https://e-estonia.com/solutions/cyber-security/ksi-blockchain/
Escobar, F., Almeida, W. H. C., & Varajão, J. (2023). Digital transformation success in the public sector: : A systematic literature review of cases, processes, and success factors. Information Polity, 28(1), 61-81. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-211518
Filer, T. (2019). Thinking about GovTech: A brief Guide for Policemakers. Bennet Institute for Public Police Cambrigde.
Gomes, L. A. D. V., Facin, A. L. F., Salerno, M. S., & Ikenami, R. K. (2018). Unpacking the innovation ecosystem construct: Evolution, gaps and trends. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 30-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.009
Granstrand, O., & Holgersson, M. (2020). Innovation ecosystems: A conceptual review and a new definition. Technovation, 90-91, 102098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2019.102098
Güler, M., & Büyüközkan, G. (2023). A Survey of Digital Government: Science Mapping Approach, Application Areas, and Future Directions. Systems, 11(12), 563. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11120563
Jain, S. J., Sibbu, K., & Kuri, R. (2023). Conducting Effective Research using SciSpace: A Practical Approach. https://doi.org/10.22541/au.170111059.99508682/v1
Jain, S., Kumar, A., Roy, T., Shinde, K., Vignesh, G., & Tondulkar, R. (2024). SciSpace Literature Review: Harnessing AI for Effortless Scientific Discovery. Em N. Goharian, N. Tonellotto, Y. He, A. Lipani, G. McDonald, & I. Ounis (Eds.), Advances in Information Retrieval (v. 14612, pp. 256-260). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56069-9_28
Jalilian, N., & Zanjirchi, S. M. (2023). Theoretical development of innovation ecosystem: A three-decade research landscape. International Journal of Innovation Science, 15(2), 224-244. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-09-2021-0176
Kilian, M., Raghavan, P., & Anna Alles. (2022). Advancing the GovTech trend will strengthen public services. Word Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/12/how-making-the-most-out-of-govtechs-boom-will-strengthen-public-services/
Kuziemski, M., & Mergel, I. (2022). GovTech practices in the EU: A glimpse into the European GovTech ecosystem, its governance, and best practices. Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/74735
Labanava, A., Liiv, I., & Pappel, I. (2023). Capacity Building in GovTech for Measuring and Achievement of Sustainable Development Goals. Em Proceedings of the14th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2023). https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1003888
Mergel, I., Dickinson, H., Stenvall, J., & Gasco, M. (2023). Implementing AI in the public sector. Public Management Review, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2231950
Mergenthaler, S., & Buckup, S. (2024). Could GovTech help rebuild trust through public innovation? WEForum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2024/01/how-govtech-could-rebuild-trust-through-this-berlin-initiative/
Morgan, D. L. (2023). Exploring the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Qualitative Data Analysis: The Case of ChatGPT. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 16094069231211248. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231211248
Mortati, M., Ilaria, M., & Rizzo, F. (2023, outubro 9). How Design Thinking can support the establishment of an EU GovTech ecosystem. IASDR 2023: Life-Changing Design. IASDR 2023: Life-Changing Design. https://doi.org/10.21606/iasdr.2023.356
Nikolic, S., Sandison, C., Haque, R., Daniel, S., Grundy, S., Belkina, M., Lyden, S., Hassan, G. M., & Neal, P. (2024). ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, SciSpace and Wolfram versus higher education assessments: An updated multi-institutional study of the academic integrity impacts of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) on assessment, teaching and learning in engineering. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 29(2), 126-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2024.2372154
Organização para a Cooperação e Desenvolvimento Econômico. (2024). Enabling Digital Innovation in Government: The OECD GovTech Policy Framework. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/a51eb9b2-en
Paez, A. (2017). Gray literature: An important resource in systematic reviews. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 10(3), 233-240. https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12266
Public. (2021). The State of European GovTech. Key Themes and Players in the European GovTech Ecosystem. https://view.publitas.com/public-1/the-state-of-european-govtech-report/
Riffe, D., Lacy, S., Watson, B. R., & Fico, F. (2019). Analyzing Media Messages: Using Quantitative Content Analysis in Research (4ª ed). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429464287
Santiso, C. (2022). Govtech against corruption: What are the integrity dividends of government digitalization? Data & Policy, 4, e39. https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2022.31
Scott, J. (2014). A Matter of Record: Documentary Sources in Social Research. John Wiley & Sons.
Shim, D. C., & Eom, T. H. (2008). E-Government and Anti-Corruption: Empirical Analysis of International Data. International Journal of Public Administration, 31(3), 298-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690701590553
Silve, A., & Moszoro, M. (2023). The Political Economy of GovTech. IMF Notes, 2023(003), 1. https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400246500.068
Viner, Z., Taylor, H., & Kore, J. (2021). The State of European GovTech Report. Pubic.
World Bank. (2020, novembro). GovTech: The New Frontier in Digital Government Transformation. https://documentos.bancomundial.org/es/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/898571612344883836/govtech-the-new-frontier-in-digital-government-transformation
World Bank. (2022). GovTech Maturity Index, 2022 Update: Trends in Public Sector Digital Transformation (Other ESW Reports). World Bank. https://hdl.handle.net/10986/38499
World Bank. (2023a). GovTech Maturity Index, 2022 Update — Regional Brief: East and Southern Africa (Equitable Growth, Finance & Institutions Insight). https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/39663
World Bank. (2023b). GovTech Maturity Index, 2022 Update — Regional Brief: East Asia and Pacific (Equitable Growth, Finance & Institutions Insight). https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/39668
World Bank. (2023c). GovTech Maturity Index, 2022 Update — Regional Brief: Europe and Central Asia (Equitable Growth, Finance & Institutions Insight). https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/39667
World Bank. (2023d). GovTech Maturity Index, 2022 Update — Regional Brief: Latin America and the Caribbean (Equitable Growth, Finance & Institutions Insight). https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/39666
World Bank. (2023e). GovTech Maturity Index, 2022 Update — Regional Brief: Middle East and North Africa (Equitable Growth, Finance & Institutions Insight). https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/39664
World Bank. (2023f). GovTech Maturity Index, 2022 Update — Regional Brief: South Asia (Equitable Growth, Finance & Institutions Insight). https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/39669
World Bank. (2023g). GovTech Maturity Index, 2022 Update — Regional Brief: West and Central Africa (Equitable Growth, Finance & Institutions Insight). https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/39661
Yoshida, M., & Thammetar, T. (2021). Education Between GovTech and Civic Tech. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(04), 52. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i04.18769
Cómo citar
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Dayse Karenine De Oliveira Carneiro, Nathalia de Melo Santos, Mauro Célio Araújo dos Reis, Darlla Layse Torres de Lima
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Los contenidos de la revista se distribuyen bajo la licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-4.0), que permite a los usuarios copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente los contenidos, siempre y cuando se cite la autoría (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0).