Evaluación de Programas Públicos de Gobernanza Colaborativa: El Pacto por una Región Sostenible e Inclusiva, Chile
Evaluation of Public Collaborative Governance Program: The Pact for a Sustainable and Inclusive Region, Chile
Avaliação do Programa de Governança Pública Colaborativa: O Pacto para uma Região Sustentável e Inclusiva, Chile
Resumen (es)
El presente artículo evalúa un proceso de gobernanza colaborativa realizado en Chile a escala regional. Se convocó a actores públicos y privados con el fin de definir desafíos y compromisos para la sostenibilidad e inclusión de la región de Los Lagos bajo un enfoque colaborativo de gobernanza, que concluyó con un conjunto de compromisos públicos y privados para ocho sectores productivos. El estudio aplica un modelo evaluativo integrado de la experiencia, que combina la evaluación de objetivos y de procesos. Se diseñaron y aplicaron instrumentos de evaluación consistentes en análisis documental y tres encuestas de percepción dirigidas a los actores involucrados. Los resultados indican alta adhesión a nuevas formas de gobernanza colaborativa, una valoración positiva de la experiencia y disposición para participar de procesos similares, además de una percepción optimista sobre el cumplimiento de los compromisos pactados. No obstante, los actores señalaron que el financiamiento público de las iniciativas y la coordinación representan los aspectos más críticos para el cumplimiento de los compromisos establecidos. Este trabajo constituye una contribución al campo de la evaluación, un área menos desarrollada en el análisis de políticas y programas públicos, al aportar evidencia empírica sobre modelos evaluativos de experiencias de gobernanza colaborativa.
Resumen (en)
This paper evaluates a collaborative governance process carried out in Chile on a regional scale. Public and private actors were called upon to define challenges and commitments for the sustainability and inclusion of the Los Lagos region under a collaborative governance approach that concluded with a set of public and private obligations for eight productive sectors. The paper applies an integrated evaluation model of the experience that combines the evaluation of objectives and processes. Evaluation instruments were designed and applied, consisting of documentary analysis and three perception surveys of the process actors. The results indicate a high adherence to new forms of collaborative governance, a high appreciation of the experience and willingness to participate in similar processes, and an optimistic opinion on fulfilling the agreed commitments. The actors also considered that public financing of the committed initiatives and coordination constitute the most critical aspects in the fulfillment of the established commitments. This paper advances evaluation, a less developed area within the process of public policy and program analysis. A specific contribution is the presentation of empirical evidence on evaluative models for collaborative governance experiences.
Resumen (pt_BR)
O trabalho avalia um processo de governança colaborativa realizado no Chile em escala regional. Atores públicos e privados foram convocados para definir desafios e compromissos para a sustentabilidade e inclusão da região de Los Lagos sob uma abordagem de governação colaborativa que concluiu com um conjunto de compromissos públicos e privados para oito setores produtivos. O trabalho aplica um modelo avaliativo integrado de experiência que combina a avaliação de objetivos e processos. Foram elaborados e aplicados instrumentos de avaliação compostos por análise documental e três pesquisas de percepção dos atores do processo. Os resultados indicam uma elevada adesão a novas formas de governação colaborativa, uma elevada valorização da experiência e da vontade de participar em processos semelhantes, e uma opinião optimista sobre o cumprimento dos compromissos acordados. Os actores consideraram também que o financiamento público das iniciativas comprometidas e a coordenação constituem os aspectos mais críticos no cumprimento dos compromissos estabelecidos. O trabalho contribui ao avançar em um domínio menos desenvolvido – a avaliação – das políticas públicas e do processo programático. Uma contribuição específica do trabalho é apresentar evidências empíricas sobre modelos avaliativos de experiências de governança colaborativa.
Referencias
Abelson, J., & Gauvin, F. (2006). Assessing the impacts of public participation: Concepts, evidence, and policy implications. Canadian Policy Research Networks Inc.
Aguilar, L. (2024). La nueva gobernanza pública: Un panorama conceptual. Perfiles Latinoamericanos, 32(63), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.18504/pl3263-001-2024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18504/pl3263-001-2024
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
Beidas, R., Hannon, P., James, A., & Emmons, K. (2022). Advancing gender equity in the academy. Science Advances, 8(13), eabq0430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abq0430 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abq0430
Bertranou, J. (2019). El seguimiento y la evaluación de políticas públicas: Modelos disponibles para producir conocimiento y mejorar el desempeño de las intervenciones públicas. Millcayac – Revista Digital de Ciencias Sociales, 6(10), 151–188. https://revistas.uncu.edu.ar/ojs3/index.php/millca-digital/article/view/1730
Bottrill, M., & Pressey, R. (2012). The effectiveness and evaluation of conservation planning. Conservation Letters, 5, 407–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00268.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00268.x
Bundi, P., & Trein, P. (2022). Evaluation use and learning in public policy. Policy Sciences, 55(2), 283–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-022-09462-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-022-09462-6
Bustelo, M. (2003). Evaluation of gender mainstreaming: Ideas from a meta-evaluation study. Evaluation, 9(4), 383–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/135638900300900402 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389003094002
Chess, C. (2000). Evaluating environmental public participation: Methodological questions. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43(6), 769–784. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09640560020001674 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560020001674
Conley, A., & Moote, M. (2003). Evaluating collaborative natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources, 16(5), 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920309181 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920309181
Cousins, J. B., Goh, S. C., Elliott, C. J., & Bourgeois, I. (2014). Framing the capacity to do and use evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 2014(141), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20076 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20076
Diez, M., Etxano, I., & Garmendia, E. (2015). Evaluating participatory processes in conservation policy and governance: Lessons from a Natura 2000 pilot case study. Environmental Policy and Governance, 25(2), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1667 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1667
Engeli, I., & Mazur, A. (2018). Taking implementation seriously in assessing success: The politics of gender equality policy. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 1(1–2), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1332/251510818X15282097548558 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/251510818X15282097548558
Espinosa-Fajardo, J., Bustelo, M., & Velasco, M. (2022). ¿Cómo evaluar el cambio estructural de género en universidades? Aprendizajes de una práctica colaborativa y feminista. IgualdadES, 7, 413–440. https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/IgdES.7.03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/IgdES.7.03
Glücker, J., Rehner, J., & Handke, M. (2019). Gobernanza, redes y territorio. Revista de Geografía del Norte Grande, (74), 5–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34022019000300005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34022019000300005
Herbert, J. (2014). Researching evaluation influence: A review of the literature. Evaluation Review, 38(5), 388–419. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0193841X14547230 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X14547230
Johnson, K., Greenseid, L. O., Toal, S. A., King, J. A., Lawrenz, F., & Volkov, B. (2009). Research on evaluation use: A review of the empirical literature from 1986 to 2005. American Journal of Evaluation, 30(3), 377–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214009341660 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214009341660
Kawulich, B. (2005). La observación participante como método de recolección de datos. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 6(2), 1–32.
Kowacs, E., Keleman, E., Kiss, G., Kaloczkai, A., Fabók, V., Mihók, B., Megyesi, B., Pataki, G., Bodorkós, B., Blázs, B., Bela, G., Margóczi, K., Roboz, A., & Molnár, D. (2017). Evaluation of participatory planning: Lessons from Hungarian Natura 2000 management planning processes. Journal of Environmental Management, 204(1), 540–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.09.028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.09.028
Laurian, L., & Shaw, M. (2008). Evaluation of public participation: The practices of certified planners. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28(3), 293–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X08326532 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X08326532
Ledermann, S. (2012). Exploring the necessary conditions for evaluation use in program change. American Journal of Evaluation, 33(2), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214011411573 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214011411573
Löther, A., & Maurer, E. (2008). Evaluation of gender equality policies. En S. Grenz, B. Kortendiek, M. Kriszio, & A. Löther (Eds.), Gender equality programmes in higher education (pp. 53–67). VS Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91218-9_5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91218-9_5
Newman, J., Barnes, M., Sullivan, H., & Knops, A. (2004). Public participation and collaborative governance. Journal of Social Policy, 3(2), 203–223. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279403007499 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279403007499
Nirenberg, O. (n.d.). Evaluar para la transformación: Innovaciones en la evaluación de programas y proyectos sociales. Paidós.
Rauschmayer, F., Berghöfer, A., Omann, I., & Zikos, D. (2009). Examining processes or/and outcomes? Evaluation concepts in European governance of natural resources. Environmental Policy and Governance, 19, 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.506 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.506
Rivera-Mercado, C., Zahn-Muñoz, C., Díaz-López, G., Gallardo-Gallardo, J., Braüning-Wistuba, M., & Garrido-Álvarez, O. (2024). Gobernanza colaborativa multinivel en territorios que buscan descentralización: Una experiencia innovadora para la sostenibilidad en la Región de Los Lagos, Chile. Estado, Gobierno y Gestión Pública, 22(43), 16–44. https://doi.org/10.5354/0717-8980.2024.74540 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5354/0717-8980.2024.74540
Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. (2000). Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 25(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390002500101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390002500101
Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. (2004). Evaluating public-participation exercises: A research agenda. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 29(4), 512–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243903259197 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243903259197
Rowe, G., Marsh, R., & Frewer, L. (2004). Evaluation of a deliberative conference. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 29(1), 88–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243903259194 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243903259194
Shulha, L. M., Whitmore, E., Cousins, J. B., Gilbert, N., & al Hudib, H. (2016). Introducing evidence-based principles to guide collaborative approaches to evaluation: Results of an empirical process. American Journal of Evaluation, 37(2), 193–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214015615230 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214015615230
Stephenson, P., Schoenefeld, J., & Leeuw, F. (2019). The politicisation of evaluation: Constructing and contesting EU policy performance. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 60(4), 663–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-019-00212-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-019-00212-7
Weiss, C. (1999). The interface between evaluation and public policy. Evaluation, 5(4), 468–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/135638909900500408 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/135638909900500408
Weiss, C., Murphy-Graham, E., & Birkeland, S. (2005). An alternate route to policy influence: How evaluations affect DARE. American Journal of Evaluation, 26(1), 12–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214004273337 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214004273337
Yáñez, M. (2022). Principales usos de la evaluación de políticas públicas y programas en España. Revista Estatal de Políticas Públicas, 8(1), 27–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.5354/0719-6296.2022.65039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-6296.0.65039
Zurbriggen, C. (2011). Gobernanza: Una mirada desde América Latina. Perfiles Latinoamericanos, (38), 39–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18504/pl1938-039-2011
Cómo citar
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Cristian Zahn Muñoz, Claudio Rivera-Mercado
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Los contenidos de la revista se distribuyen bajo la licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-4.0), que permite a los usuarios copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente los contenidos, siempre y cuando se cite la autoría (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0).