Governança de redes de laboratórios de inovação pública: a experiência da Rede InovaGovSC
Governance of Networks of Public Innovation Laboratories: The Experience of the InovaGovSC Network
Gobernanza de las redes de laboratorios públicos de innovación: la experiencia de la Red InovaGovSC
Resumen (es)
En el artículo, se analiza la red InovaGovSC desde la perspectiva de la gobernanza en cuanto a sus características y desafíos. La red reúne a los laboratorios de innovación del Gobierno del Estado de Santa Catarina, que operan con foco en objetivos comunes. La investigación se desarrolló con base en las siguientes categorías de gobernanza de redes y ecosistemas de innovación: enfoque de gobernanza; objetivos comunes y co-creación de valor; actores y roles; relación entre actores; mecanismos de coordinación; y metas y evaluación. Los datos se recolectaron mediante investigación documental y entrevistas semiestructuradas. El análisis implicó enfoque temático y triangulación de datos. Los resultados indican una gobernanza que combina características top-down y bottom-up, formales e informales, centralizadas y descentralizadas. El apoyo de alto nivel es central, mientras que la volatilidad del poder en la Administración Pública es un desafío. Los procesos de gestión del conocimiento y evaluación también son obstáculos por superar. El artículo busca contribuir a los gestores de redes de innovación que actúan en la gestión de laboratorios públicos de innovación, y a la literatura, ya que aún hay una falta de trabajos con evidencias empíricas relacionadas con el tema.
Resumen (pt_BR)
Neste artigo, analisa-se a Rede InovaGovSC sob a perspectiva da governança no que tange a suas características e desafios. A rede congrega os laboratórios de inovação do governo do estado de Santa Catarina, que atuam com foco em objetivos comuns. A pesquisa foi desenvolvida com base nas seguintes categorias da governança de redes e ecossistemas de inovação: abordagem de governança; objetivos comuns e cocriação de valor; atores e papéis; relação entre atores; mecanismos de coordenação; e metas e avaliação. Os dados foram coletados por meio de levantamento documental e entrevistas semiestruturadas. A análise envolveu a abordagem temática e a triangulação de dados. Os resultados indicam uma governança que mescla características top-down e bottom-up, formal e informal, centralizadas e descentralizadas. O apoio do alto escalão é central, ao mesmo tempo em que a volatilidade do poder na Administração Pública representa um desafio. Além disso, a gestão do conhecimento e os processos avaliativos são obstáculos a serem superados. O artigo procura contribuir para a capacitação de gestores de redes de inovação que atuam na gestão de laboratórios de inovação pública e para a literatura, uma vez que ainda há carência de trabalhos com evidências empíricas relacionadas ao tema.
Resumen (en)
In this article, the InovaGovSC network is analyzed from the perspective of governance regarding its characteristics and challenges. The network brings together the innovation laboratories of the Government of the State of Santa Catarina, which operate with focus on common objectives. The research was developed based on the following categories of governance of innovation networks and ecosystems: governance approach; common objectives and value co-creation; actors and roles; relationship between actors; coordination mechanisms, and goals and evaluation. Data was collected through documentary research and semi-structured interviews. The analysis involved thematic analysis and data triangulation. The results indicate a governance that combines top-down and bottom-up, formal and informal, centralized and decentralized characteristics. Top-level support is central, while the volatility of power in Public Administration is a challenge. Knowledge management and evaluation processes are also challenges. The article seeks to contribute to innovation network managers who work in the management of public innovation laboratories, and to the literature, since there is still a lack of work with empirical evidence related to the topic.
Referencias
Adner, R. (2006). Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard Business Review, 84(4), 98-107.
Agranoff, R. (2014). Reconstructing bureaucracy for service: Innovation in the governance era. In C. Ansell, & J. Torfing (Eds.), Public Innovation through Collaboration and Design (pp. 44-62). Routledge.
Ansell, C., & Torfing, J. (2014). Collaboration and design: New tools for public innovation. In C. Ansell, & J. Torfing (Eds.), Public Innovation through Collaboration and Design (pp. 1-18). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203795958
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2018). Collaborative platforms as a governance strategy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(1), 16-32. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mux030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mux030
Ansell, C., & Torfing, J. (2021). Public governance as co-creation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108765381 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108765381
Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic as a game changer for public administration and leadership? The need for robust governance responses to turbulent problems. Public Management Review, 23(7), 949-960. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1820272 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1820272
Arena, M., Azzone, G., & Piantoni, G. (2022). Uncovering value creation in innovation ecosystems: Paths towards shared value. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25, 432-451. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-06-2021-0289 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-06-2021-0289
Autio, E. (2021). Orchestrating ecosystems: A multi-layered framework. Innovation: Organization and Management, 24(1), 96-109. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2021.1919120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2021.1919120
Bentzen, T. Ø., & Torfing, J. (2023). COVID-19-induced governance transformation: How external shocks may spur cross-organizational collaboration and trust-based management. Public Administration, 101(4), 1291-1308. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12881 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12881
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2016). (Mis)conceptualising themes, thematic analysis, and other problems with Fugard and Potts’ (2015) sample-size tool for thematic analysis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19(6), 739-743.https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1195588 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1195588
Camboim, G. F., Zawislak, P. A., & Pufal, N. A. (2019). Driving elements to make cities smarter: Evidences from European projects. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142, 154-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.09.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.09.014
Carneiro, D. K. O., Isidro, A., & Criado, J. I. (2022). Atores do ecossistema de inovação no setor público: Uma abordagem qualitativa comparada Brasil-Espanha. New Trends in Qualitative Research, 14, e726. https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.14.2022.e726 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.14.2022.e726
Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Press.
Cinar, E., Trott, P., & Simms, C. (2018). A systematic review of barriers to public sector innovation process. Public Management Review, 21(2), 264-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1473477 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1473477
Cobben, D., Ooms, W., Roijakkers, N., & Radziwon, A. (2022). Ecosystem types: A systematic review on boundaries and goals. Journal of Business Research, 142, 138-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.046 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.046
Cooke, P. (1992). Regional innovation systems: Competitive regulation in the new Europe. Geoforum, 23(3), 365-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7185(92)90048-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7185(92)90048-9
Creswell, J. W. (2007) Projetos de pesquisa: métodos qualitativos, quantitativos e mistos. (2ª ed.). Artmed.
Criado, J. I., Alcaide-Muñoz, L., & Liarte, I. (2023). Two decades of public sector innovation: building an analytical framework from a systematic literature review of types, strategies, conditions, and results. Public Management Review, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2254310 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2254310
Crosby, B. C., Hart, P. T., & Torfing, J. (2017). Public value creation through collaborative innovation. Public Management Review, 19(5), 655-669. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1192165 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1192165
Demircioglu, M. A. (2023). Public sector innovation: sources, benefits, and leadership. International Public Management Journal, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2023.2276481 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2023.2276481
De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2638618 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and ‘mode 2’ to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
Faria, Y., Itaborahy, F. B., Palvarini, B. C., Endo, I. C., & Roncaratti, L. S. (2017). Experiências da rede de inovação no setor público INOVAGOV. In P. Cavalcante, M. Camões, B. Cunha, & W. Severo (Eds.), Inovação no setor público: Teoria, tendências e casos no Brasil (pp. 241-248). Enap.
Foguesatto, C. R., Santini, M. A. F., Martins, B.V., Faccin, K., Mello S. F., & Balestrin, A. (2021). What is going on recently in the innovation ecosystem field? A bibliometric and content-based analysis. International Journal of Innovation Management, 25(7), https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919621300014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919621300014
Freeman, C. (1995). The ‘national system of innovation’ in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 5-24. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035309 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035309
Hoffmann, M. G. H., Murad, E. P., Lemos, D. D. C., Farias, J. S., & Sanches, B. L. (2022). Characteristics of innovation ecosystems’ governance: An integrative literature review. International Journal of Innovation Management, 26(8). http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1363919622500621 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919622500621
Kinder, T. (2013). Innovation in an inter-organizational context. In S. P. Osborne, & L. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of Innovation in Public Services (pp. 317-331). Edward Elgar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849809740.00033
Li, A. Q., Claes, B., Kumar, M., & Found, P. (2022). Exploring the governance mechanisms for value cocreation in PSS business ecosystems. Industrial Marketing Management, 104, 289-303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.05.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.05.005
Lopes, A. V., & Farias, J. S. (2020). How can governance support collaborative innovation in the public sector? A systematic review of the literature. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0020852319893444 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852319893444
Lundvall, B. A. (1992). National Systems of Innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter.
Nelson, R. (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford University Press.
Pruvot, F., Dupont, L., & Morel, L. (2023). Territorial dynamics supported by a collaborative network of innovation labs: Toward an approach to establish a portfolio of indicators to monitor and assess their territorial impact. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 19, 123-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0219877024500123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877024500123
Raudla, R., Mohr, Z., & Douglas, J. W. (2024). Which managerial reforms facilitate public sector innovation? Public Administration, 102, 771-788. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/padm.12951 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12951
Sano, H. (2020). Laboratórios de inovação no setor público: Mapeamento e diagnóstico de experiências nacionais. Enap.
Santos, D. A., Zen, A., & Bittencourt, B. A. (2022). From governance to choreography: Coordination of innovation ecosystems. Innovation, & Management Review, 19(1), 26-3. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-08-2020-0117 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-08-2020-0117
Solis, M., & Mora-Esquivel, R. (2019). Development and validation of a measurement scale of the innovative culture in work teams. International Journal of Innovation Sciences, 11(2), 299-322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-07-2018-0073 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-07-2018-0073
Tõnurist, P., Kattel, R., & Lember, V. (2017). Innovation labs in the public sector: What they are and what they do? Public Management Review, 19(10), 1455-1479. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1287939 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1287939
Valles, S. M. S. (2007). Técnicas Cualitativas de Investigación Social: reflexión metodológica y práctica profesional. Síntesis.
Van Gestel, N., & Grotenbreg, S. (2021). Collaborative governance and innovation in public service settings. Policy & Politics, 49(2), 249-265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/030557321X16123785900606 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/030557321X16123785900606
Von Hippel, E. (1986). The sources of innovation. Oxford University Press.
Wegner, D., & Verschoore, J. (2021). Network governance in action: Functions and practices to foster collaborative environments. Administration, & Society, 54(3), 479-499. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997211024580 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997211024580
Zappellini, B., & Feuerschutte, S. G. (2015). O uso da triangulação na pesquisa científica brasileira em administração. Administração Ensino e Pesquisa, 16(2), 241-273. https://doi.org/10.13058/raep.2015.v16n2.238 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13058/raep.2015.v16n2.238
Cómo citar
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Anna Claudia Krüger, Mayla Mendel de Sylos Fabris, Tatiana Custódio, Micheline Gaia Hoffmann
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Los contenidos de la revista se distribuyen bajo la licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-4.0), que permite a los usuarios copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente los contenidos, siempre y cuando se cite la autoría (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0).