A experiência subjetiva dos encargos administrativos: O tempo gasto acessando serviços nos afeta emocionalmente?
La experiencia subjetiva de cargas administrativas:¿Nos afecta emocionalmente gastar tiempo para acceder a servicios?
The subjective experience of administrative burdens: Does it affect us emotionally to spend time accessing services?
Resumo (pt_BR)
O estudo dos encargos administrativos identificou os custos que os cidadãos podem enfrentar nos seus esforços para obter um acesso real aos serviços públicos e aos benefícios sociais. No entanto, sabe-se menos sobre como a experiência de encargos administrativos afeta emocionalmente as pessoas. Apresentamos a análise de dados originais de uma pesquisa mexicana sobre se 1) o tempo gasto em tarefas administrativas ou 2) a situação de vulnerabilidade das pessoas explica a variação de emoções positivas ou negativas sobre a realização de tarefas administrativas. Apenas uma relação estatisticamente significativa é encontrada para certos indicadores de vulnerabilidade. Propõe-se como possível explicação que as experiências burocráticas negativas no contexto mexicano confirmam as baixas expectativas anteriores em relação às burocracias e, portanto, não têm mais impacto na satisfação emocional dos cidadãos. Os resultados sugerem uma atitude aprendida com as repetidas insatisfações dos cidadãos em suas interações com o Estado.
Resumo (es)
El estudio de cargas administrativas ha identificado los costos que los ciudadanos pueden experimentar en sus esfuerzos por obtener acceso real a servicios públicos y beneficios sociales. Sin embargo, se sabe menos sobre cómo la experiencia de cargas administrativas afecta emocionalmente a las personas. Se presenta el análisis de datos originales de una encuesta mexicana sobre si 1) el tiempo gastado en tareas administrativas o 2) la situación de vulnerabilidad de personas explica la variación en emociones positivas o negativas sobre hacer tareas administrativas. Solamente se encuentra una relación estadísticamente significativa para ciertos indicadores de vulnerabilidad. Se propone como posible explicación qué experiencias burocráticas negativas en el contexto mexicano confirman bajas expectativas previas hacia las burocracias y, por lo tanto, ya no tengan un impacto en la satisfacción emocional de los ciudadanos. Los hallazgos sugieren una actitud aprendida de reiteradas insatisfacciones de ciudadanos en sus interacciones con el Estado.
Resumo (en)
The study of administrative burdens has identified the costs that citizens may experience in their efforts to gain real access to public services and social benefits. However, less is known about how the experience of administrative burdens affects people emotionally. We present the analysis of original data from a Mexican survey on whether 1) the time spent on administrative tasks or 2) the situation of vulnerability of people explains the variation in positive or negative emotions about doing administrative tasks. Only a statistically significant relationship is found for certain vulnerability indicators. It is proposed as a possible explanation that negative bureaucratic experiences in the Mexican context confirm previous low expectations towards bureaucracies and, therefore, no longer have an impact on the emotional satisfaction of citizens. The findings suggest an attitude learned from repeated dissatisfactions of citizens in their interactions with the State.
Referências
Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. K., & Joo, H. (2013). Best-Practice Recommendations for Defining, Identifying, and Handling Outliers. Organizational Research Methods, 16(2), 270-301. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112470848
Ali, S. A. M., & Altaf, S. W. (2021). Citizen trust, administrative capacity and administrative burden in Pakistan’s immunization program. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.30636/jbpa.41.184
Baekgaard, M., & Madsen, J. K. (2024). Anticipated administrative burdens: How proximity to upcoming compulsory meetings affect welfare recipients' experiences of administrative burden. Public Administration, 102(2), 425-443. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12928
Baekgaard, M., Martin, L., & Petersen, N.B. (2025). Experiences of administrative burden in context: Exploring differences across countries, policy domains, and socio-demography. Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.70019
Baekgaard, M., & Serritzlew, S. (2016). Interpreting performance information: Motivated reasoning or unbiased comprehension. Public Administration Review, 76(1), 73-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12406
Barnes, C. Y. (2021). ‘It takes a while to get used to’: The costs of redeeming public benefits. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(2), 295-310. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa042
Bell, E., Ter-Mkrtchyan, A., Wehde, W., & Smith, K. (2021). Just or Unjust? How Ideological Beliefs Shape Street-Level Bureaucrats’ Perceptions of Administrative Burden. Public Administration Review, 81(4), 610-624. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13311
Bell, E., Wright, J. E., & Oh, J. (2024). Does Administrative Burden Create Racialized Policy Feedback? How Losing Access to Public Benefits Impacts Beliefs About Government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 34(3), 432-447. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muae004
Bhuiyan, S. A., & Baniamin, H. M. (2023). Who puts the thorn in the citizen’s flesh? Sources underlying administrative burden in a developing country. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 45(4), 345-361. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2023.2183873
Bozeman, B. (1993). A theory of government “red tape”. Journal of public administration research and theory, 3(3), 273-304. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037171
Brinks, D. M., Levitsky, S., & Murillo, M. V. (Eds.). (2020). The politics of institutional weakness in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.
Brodkin, E. Z., & Majmundar, M. (2010). Administrative exclusion: Organizations and the hidden costs of welfare claiming. Journal of public administration research and theory, 20(4), 827-848. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mup046
Burden, B. C., Canon, D. T., Mayer, K. R., & Moynihan, D. P. (2012). The effect of administrative burden on bureaucratic perception of policies: Evidence from election administration. Public Administration Review, 72(5), 741-751. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02600.x
Carrigan, C., Pandey, S. K., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2020). Pursuing Consilience: Using Behavioral Public Administration to Connect Research on Bureaucratic Red Tape, Administrative Burden, and Regulation. Public Administration Review, 80, 46-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13143
Christensen, J., Aarøe, L., Baekgaard, M., Herd, P., & Moynihan, D. P. (2020). Human capital and administrative burden: The role of cognitive resources in citizen‐state interactions. Public Administration Review, 80(1), 127-136. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13134
Chudnovsky, M., & Peeters, R. (2021). The unequal distribution of administrative burden: A framework and an illustrative case study for understanding variation in people's experience of burdens. Social Policy & Administration, 55(4), 527-542. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12639
Chudnovsky, M., & Peeters, R. (2022). A cascade of exclusion: Administrative burdens and access to citizenship in the case of Argentina’s National Identity Document. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 88(4), 1068-1085. https://doi.org/10.1177/002085232098454
Eiró, F., & Lotta, G. (2024). On the frontline of global inequalities: A decolonial approach to the study of street-level bureaucracies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 34(1), 67-79. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muad019
Halling, A., & Baekgaard, M. (2024). Administrative burden in citizen–state interactions: A systematic literature review. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 34(2), 180-195. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muad023
Heinrich, C. J. (2016). The Bite of Administrative Burden: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(3), 403-420. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muv034
Heinrich, C. J. (2018). Presidential Address: ‘A Thousand Petty Fortresses’: Administrative Burden in U.S. Immigration Policies and its Consequences. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 37(2), 211-239. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22046
Herd, P., & Moynihan, D. P. (2018). Administrative Burden: Policymaking by Other Means. Russell Sage Foundation.
James, O. (2009). Evaluating the Expectations Disconfirmation and Expectations Anchoring Approaches to Citizen Satisfaction with Local Public Services. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(1), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum034
Ključnikov, A., & Sobeková Majková, M. (2016). Impact of Gender in the Perception of Administrative Burdens among Young Entrepreneurs - Evidence from Slovakia. Journal of Competitiveness, 8(2), 17-30.
Kumlin, S. (2004). The personal and the political: How personal welfare state experiences affect political trust and ideology. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403980274_1
Kyle, M. A., & Frakt, A. B. (2021). Patient administrative burden in the US health care system. Health Services Research, 56(5), 755-765. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13861
Luhmann, M., & Intelisano, S. (2018). Hedonic adaptation and the set point for subjective well-being. En E. Diener, S. Oishi, & L. Tay (Eds.), Handbook of well-being (pp. 1-27). DEF Publishers.
Martin, L., Delaney, L., & Doyle, O. (2023). Everyday Administrative Burdens and Inequality. Public Administration Review, 84(4), 660-673. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13709
Masood, A., & Nisar, M. A. (2020). Crushed between two stones: Competing institutional logics in the implementation of maternity leave policies in Pakistan. Gender, Work & Organization, 27, 1103-1126. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12448
Masood, A., & Nisar, M. A. (2021). Administrative capital and citizens’ responses to administrative burden. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(1), 56-72. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa031
Morgeson, F. V. (2013). Expectations, Disconfirmation, and Citizen Satisfaction with the US Federal Government: Testing and Expanding the Model. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(2), 289-305. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus012
Moynihan, D., Gerzina, J., & Herd, P. (2022). Kafka’s Bureaucracy: Immigration Administrative Burdens in the Trump Era. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 5(1), 22-35. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvab025
Moynihan, D., & Herd, P. (2020). Cargas administrativas: Los cotos que el Estado impone a los ciudadanos. En R. Peeters & F. Nieto Morales (eds.), La máquina de la desigualdad: Una exploración de los costos y las causas de las burocracias de baja confianza (pp. 31-53). CIDE; El Colegio de México.
Moynihan, D., Herd, P., & Harvey, H. (2015). Administrative burden: Learning, psychological, and compliance costs in citizen-state interactions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 43-69. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu009
Moynihan, D. P., Herd, P., & Rigby, E. (2016). Policymaking by Other Means: Do States Use Administrative Barriers to Limit Access to Medicaid. Administration & Society, 48(4), 497-524. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713503540
Moynihan, D. P., & Soss, J. (2014). Policy feedback and the politics of administration. Public administration review, 74(3), 320-332. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12200
Mullainathan, S., & Shafir, E. (2013). Scarcity: Why having too little means so much. Henry Holt.
Nisar, M. A. (2018). Children of a lesser god: Administrative burden and social equity in citizen–state interactions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(1), 104-119. doi:10.1093/jopart/mux025
Peake, G., & Forsyth, M. (2022). Street‐level bureaucrats in a relational state: The case of Bougainville. Public Administration and Development, 42(1), 12-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1911
Peeters, R. (2020). The Political Economy of Administrative Burdens: A Theoretical Framework for Analyzing the Organizational Origins of Administrative Burdens. Administration & Society, 52(4), 566-592. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399719854367
Peeters, R., & Campos, S. A. (2021). Taking the bite out of administrative burdens: How beneficiaries of a Mexican social program ease administrative burdens in street‐level interactions. Governance, 34(4), 1001-1018. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12534
Peeters, R., & Nieto Morales, F. (2020). La máquina de la desigualdad: Una exploración de los costos y las causas de las burocracias de baja confianza. CIDE; Colegio de México.
Peeters, R., Rentería, C., & Cejudo, G. M. (2023). How information capacity shapes policy implementation: A comparison of administrative burdens in COVID-19 vaccination programs in the United States, Mexico, and the Netherlands. Government Information Quarterly, 40(4), 101871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101871
Perelmiter, L. (2022). “Fairness” in an unequal society: Welfare workers, labor inspectors and the embedded moralities of street‐level bureaucracy in Argentina. Public Administration and Development, 42(1), 85-94. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1954
Poister, T. H., & Thomas, J. C. (2011). The effect of expectations and expectancy confirmation/disconfirmation on motorists’ satisfaction with state highways. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(4), 601-617. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur004
Ray, V., Herd, P., & Moynihan, D. (2023). Racialized Burdens: Applying Racialized Organization Theory to the Administrative State, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 33(1), 139-152. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muac001
Robben, L. L., Peeters, R., & Widlak, A. (2024). Burdens on the gateway to the state: Administrative burdens in the registration of people experiencing homelessness in Belgium and the Netherlands. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 43(3), 780-803. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22598
Robles, M., Rubio, M., & Stampini, M. (2015). ¿Las transferencias monetarias han sido capaces de llegar a los pobres en América Latina y el Caribe? Resumen de Políticas del BID, no. 246. BID.
Soss, J., & Schram, S. F. (2007). A public transformed? Welfare reform as policy feedback. American political science review, 101(1), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055407070049
Suls, J., & Wheeler, L. (2012). Social comparison theory. En P. A. M. van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins, Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology (vol. 1, pp. 460-482). Sage.
Van Ryzin, G. G. (2007). Pieces of a puzzle: Linking government performance, citizen satisfaction, and trust. Public Performance & Management Review, 30(4), 521-535. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576300403
Yates, S., Carey, G., Malbon, E., & Hargrave, J. (2022). ‘Faceless Monster, Secret Society’: Women’s Experiences Navigating the Administrative Burden of Australia’s National Disability Insurance Scheme. Health & Social Care in the Community, 30, e2308–e2317.
Como Citar
Licença
Direitos autorais (c) 2026 María José Álvarez Romero, Ana Ireri Aranda Torres, Brenda Itzel Pablo Hernández, Sandra Elvira Reyes Hernández, Rik Peeters, César Rentería Marín
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
O conteúdo da revista é distribuído sob a licença Creative Commons Atribuição Não Comercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-4.0), que permite aos usuários copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir e exibir publicamente o conteúdo, desde que a autoria seja citada (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0).