Principios de igualdad y mecanismos de asignación de recursos: relevancia para el análisis de las políticas públicas

Equality Principles and Resource Allocation Mechanisms: Policy Implications

DOI: https://doi.org/10.69733/clad.ryd.n62.a899
Publicado
2015-06-01

Marc Balaguer Puig

Resumen (es)

El objeto del presente artículo es diseñar un marco de análisis que permita el estudio sistemático de los mecanismos de asignación de recursos, y en particular, de estos mecanismos de carácter público.

Para ello se identifican, a partir de las teorías de la justicia y de la literatura existente en materia de políticas sociales y de los Estados del bienestar, cuatro principios: derecho, necesidad, mérito y utilidad, y se muestra cómo estos principios se pueden concretar en cuatro mecanismos específicos de asignación de recursos, que revelan cómo las instituciones públicas resuelven los asuntos relacionados con la distribución de recursos en nuestras sociedades.

Esta tipología se estudia a partir de cuatro criterios de análisis que son: la efectividad, la discrecionalidad, la transparencia y la robustez, criterios que se operativizan con el objetivo de poder evaluar cada uno de los mecanismos identificados y con ello su validez para el análisis de las políticas públicas.

Palabras clave (ES): Política Pública, Recursos Financieros, Análisis de Políticas, Evaluación de Políticas, Propuesta

Resumen (en)

The aim of this paper is the design of an analytical framework that enables the systematical study of the resource allocation mechanisms used by the public sector.

To design this framework, four principles steaming from the theories of justice and from the literature on welfare States and social policy are identified: right, need, merit and utility. Using the analytical framework developed, it is shown that these four principles can be nailed down into a typology of allocation mechanisms, that represents how public institutions are solving distributional issues in our societies.

This typology of resource allocation mechanisms is analyzed through the following criteria: effectiveness, discretion, transparency and robustness in order to evaluate those mechanisms and thus its validity for the public policies analysis.

Palabras clave (EN): Public Policy, Financial Resources, Policies Analysis, Policies Evaluation, Proposal

Marc Balaguer Puig, Universidad de Barcelona

Profesor Asociado del Departamento de Economía y Empresa de la Universidad de Barcelona, España. Doctor en Políticas Públicas y Transformación Social por el Instituto de Gobierno y Políticas Públicas de la Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona. Ha desarrollado su trabajo en la administración pública en el Departamento de Trabajo y en el Departamento de Economía del Gobierno Autonómico de Cataluña, y en la administración local como Gerente del Pacto Industrial de la Región Metropolitana de Barcelona y Director de Cooperación Exterior en Barcelona Activa (la Agencia de desarrollo local del Ayuntamiento de Barcelona). Ha sido consultor del Banco Mundial y Visiting Fellow en el Departamento de Sociología de la Universidad de Harvard (1999-2000).
Las comunicaciones con el autor pueden dirigirse a:
Departamento de Economía Pública, Economía Política y Economía Española
Facultad de Economía y Empresa
Universidad de Barcelona
Avda. Diagonal 690, Despacho 6110
08034 Barcelona - España
E-mail: marc.balaguer@ub.edu

Referencias

Bambra, Clare (2007), “Going beyond the Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism: Regime, Theory and Public Health”, en Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, Vol. 61 Nº 12, pp. 1098-1102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2007.064295

Bardach, Eugene (2012), A Practical Guide for Policy Analysis: the Eightfold Path to More Effective Problem Solving, California, Sage.

Beetham, David (1996), Bureaucracy, Minnesota, University of Minnesota Press.

Bergh, Andreas (2004), “The Universal Welfare State: Theory and the Case of Sweden”, en Political Studies, Vol. 52 Nº 4, pp. 745-766. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2004.00506.x

Blank, Rebecca (1997), It Takes a Nation, Princeton, Princeton University Press.

Christensen, Tom …[et al] (2007), Organization Theory and the Public Sector: Instrument, Culture and Myth, London, Routledge.

Daniels, Norman …[et al] (1996), Benchmarks of Fairness for Health Care Reform, Oxford, Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195102376.001.0001

Daniels, Norman y Sabin, James (1997), “Limits to Health Care: Fair Procedures, Democratic Deliberation, and the Legitimacy Problem for Insurers”, en Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 26 Nº 4, pp. 303-350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.1997.tb00082.x

Drew, Christina y Nyerges, Timothy L. (2004), “Transparency of Environmental Decision Making: a Case Study of Soil Cleanup inside the Hanford 100 Area”, en Journal of Risk Research, Vol. 7 Nº 1, pp. 33-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1366987042000151197

Dunn, William (1981), Public Policy Analysis: an Introduction, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall.

Durose, Catherine (2009), “Front-line Workers and ‘Local Knowledge’: Neighbourhood Stories in Contemporary UK Local Governance”, en Public Administration, Vol. 87 Nº 1, pp. 35-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.01737.x

Elmore, Richard (1985), “Forward and Backward Mapping: Reversible Logics in the Analysis of Public Policy”, en Policy Implementation in Federal and Unitary Systems: Questions of Analysis and Design, K. Hanf y T. A. J. Toonen (eds.), Dordrecht, Nijhoff. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5089-4_4

Elster, Jon (1992), Local Justice, New York, Sage.

Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton, Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/095892879100100108

Etzioni, Amitai (1964), Modern Organizations, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall.

Etzioni, Amitai (2010), “Is Transparency the Best Disinfectant?”, en Journal of Political Philosophy, Vol. 18 Nº 4, pp. 389-404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2010.00366.x

Gallie, Duncan (2007), “Welfare Regimes, Employment Systems and Job Preferences Orientations”, en European Sociological Review, Vol. 23 Nº 3, pp. 279-293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcm001

Gerring, John y Thacker, Strom (2004), “Political Institutions and Corruption: the Role of Unitarism and Parliamentarism”, en British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 34 Nº 2, pp. 295-330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123404000067

Goodin, Robert y Ware, Alan (1990), Needs and Welfare, New York, Sage.

Goodin, Robert; Headey, Bruce; Muffels, Ruud; y Dirven, Henk-Jan (1999), The Real Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490927

Greenstein, Robert (1991), “Universal and Targeted Approaches to Relieving Poverty: an Alternative View”, en The Urban Underclass, C. Jencks y P. Peterson (eds.), Washington, Brookings Institution. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/20080226

Harvey, David (2009), Social Justice and the City, Athens, University of Georgia Press. Revised edition.

Heclo, Hugh (1977), A Government of Strangers: Executive Politics in Washington, Washington, Brookings Institution.

Lane, Jan-Erik (2005), Public Administration and Public Management: the Principal-Agent Perspective, London, Routledge.

Legrand, Julian (1989), The Strategy of Equality: Redistribution and the Social Services, London, Unwin Hyman.

Lewis, Jane (1992), “Gender and the Development of Welfare Regimes”, en Journal of European Social Policy, Vol. 2 Nº 3, pp. 159-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/095892879200200301

Marshall, Thomas H. (1950), Citizenship and Social Class, and Other Essays, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Masel, Joanna y Siegal, Mark L. (2009), “Robustness: Mechanisms and Consequences”, en Trends Genet, Vol. 25 Nº 9, pp. 395-403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2009.07.005

Mau, Steffen y Veghte, Benjamin (eds.) (2007), Social Justice, Legitimacy and the Welfare State, Aldershot, Ashgate.

Meyers, Marcia K. y Vorsanger, Susan (2003), “Street-Level Bureaucrats and the Implementation of Public Policy”, en Handbook of Public Administration, G. Peters y J. Pierre (eds.), Thousand Oaks, Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608214.n20

Miller, David (1999), Principles of Social Justice, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Nagel, Stuart (1991), Public Policy: Goals, Means and Methods, Lanham, University Press of America.

Okun, Arthur (1975), Equity and Efficiency: the Big Tradeoff, Washington, Brookings Institution.

Ostrom, Elinor (2000), “Crowding out Citizenship”, en Scandinavian Political Studies, Vol. 23 Nº 1, pp. 3-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.00028

Palme, Joakim y Korpi, Walter (1998), “The Paradox of Redistribution and Strategies of Equality: Welfare State Institutions, Inequality, and Poverty in the Western Countries”, en American Sociological Review, Vol. 63 Nº 5, pp. 661-687. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2657333

Palumbo, Dennis; Maynard-Moody, Steven; y Wright, Paula (1984), “Measuring Degrees of Successful Implementation”, en Evaluation Review, Vol. 8 Nº 1, pp. 45-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X8400800103

Pressman, Jeffrey y Wildavsky, Aaron (1984), Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington are Dashed in Oakland: or, Why It's Amazing that Federal Programs Work at All, this Being a Saga of the Economic Development Administration as Told by Two Sympathetic Observers who Seek to Build Morals on a Foundation of Ruined Hopes, Berkeley, University of California Press.

Puyol, Ángel (2009), “Ética y priorización de las listas de espera en sanidad”, en Listas de espera: ¿lo podemos hacer mejor?, Barcelona, Fundación Víctor Grífols i Lucas.

Requejo, Ferrán (1990), Las democracias: democracia antigua, democracia liberal y Estado de bienestar, Barcelona, Ariel.

Rosenhead, Jonathan (2002), “Robustness Analysis”, en The Informed Student Guide to Management Science, Hans Daellenbach y Robert Flood (eds.), London, Thomson Learning.

Rossell, Christine (1993), “Using Multiple Criteria to Evaluate Public Policies: the Case of School Desegregation”, en American Politics Research, Vol. 21 Nº 2, pp. 155-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X9302100201

Rossi, Peter; Lipsey, Mark; y Freeman, Howard (2004), Evaluation: a Systematic Approach, New York, Sage.

Rothstein, Bo (1998), Just Institutions Matter: the Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511598449

Sabatier, Paul y Mazmanian, Daniel (1980), “The Implementation of Public Policy: a Framework of Analysis”, en Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 8 Nº 4, pp. 538-560. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1980.tb01266.x

Sainsbury, Diane (2006), “Immigrants' Social Rights in Comparative Perspective: Welfare Regimes, Forms in Immigration and Immigration Policy Regimes”, en Journal of European Social Policy, Vol. 16 Nº 3, pp. 229-244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928706065594

Sen, Amartya (1999), Commodities and Capabilities, New York, Oxford University Press.

Sen, Amartya y Williams, Bernard (eds.) (1982), Utilitarianism and beyond, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611964

Shapiro, Ian (1998), Democratic Justice, New Haven, Yale University Press.

Shaver, Sheila (1998), “Universality or Selectivity in Income Support to Older People? A Comparative Assessment of the Issues”, en Journal of Social Policy, Vol. 27 Nº 2, pp. 231-254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S004727949800525X

Skocpol, Theda (1991), “Targeting within Universalism: Politically Viable Policies to Combat Poverty in the United States”, en The Urban Underclass, C. Jencks y P. Peterson (eds.), Washington, Brookings Institution. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/20080225

Skocpol, Theda (2000), The Missing Middle, Washington, Century Foundation.

Sorensen, Aage (1998), “Theoretical Mechanisms and the Empirical Study of Social Processes”, en Social Mechanisms, P. Hedstrom y R. Swedberg (eds.), Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Sossin, Lorne (2005), “From Neutrality to Compassion: the Place of Civil Service Values and Legal Norms in the Exercise of Administrative Discretion”, en University of Toronto Law Journal, Vol. 55 Nº 3, pp. 427-447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/tlj.2005.0028

Stiglitz, Joseph y Walsh, Carl (2006), Economics, New York, W.W. Norton and Company.

Taylor-Gooby, Peter y Martin, Rose (2010), “Fairness, Equality and Legitimacy: a Qualitative Comparative Study of Germany and the UK”, en Social Policy and Administration, Vol. 44 Nº 1, pp. 85-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2009.00701.x

Titmuss, Richard (1974), Social Policy: an Introduction, London, Allen and Unwin.

Ware, Alan y Goodin, Robert (1990), Needs and Welfare, New York, Sage.

Weimer, David L. y Vining, Aidan R. (2005), Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice, New Jersey, Prentice Hall.

Weisberg, Michael (2006), “Robustness Analysis”, en Philosophy of Science, Vol. 73 Nº 5, pp. 730-742. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/518628

Whitehead, Margaret (1985), “The Concepts and Principles of Equity and Health”, Copenhagen, World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe (Discussion Paper).

Wilson, James Q. (1989), Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It, New York, Basic Books.

Dimensions

PlumX

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Cómo citar

Balaguer Puig, M. (2015). Principios de igualdad y mecanismos de asignación de recursos: relevancia para el análisis de las políticas públicas. Revista Del CLAD Reforma Y Democracia, 62, 77-106. https://doi.org/10.69733/clad.ryd.n62.a899